Usefulness of PET–CT in the assessment of suspected recurrent colorectal carcinoma

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the usefulness of PET/CT in detecting recurrent colorectal carcinoma (CRCR) in patients subsequent to colonic resection or rectal amputation and to compare it with the PET part of integrated FDG-PET/CT. Materials and methodsPET/CTs from 32 patients with suspected CRCR were studied. Histology, clinical follow-up and additional imaging served as the gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and accuracy of PET as well as integrated PET/CT were calculated and compared for each of (a) intra-abdominal extra-hepatic recurrences, (b) extra-abdominal and/or hepatic recurrences, and (c) any form of CRCR. ResultsPPV, sensitivity, NPV, specificity and accuracy of PET in detecting intra-abdominal extra-hepatic CRCR were, respectively, 85.7%, 85.7%, 88.9%, 88.9%, and 87.5% compared with 92.9%, 92.9%, 94.5%, 94.5%, and 93.8%, respectively, for PET/CT. The corresponding values for the detection of extra-abdominal and/or hepatic CRCR were 84.6%, 84.6%, 89.5%, 89.5%, and 87.5% for PET versus 100%, 92.3%, 95%, 100%, and 96.9% for PET/CT. For all forms of recurrence, the corresponding values for PET were 80%, 80%, 66.7%, 66.7%, and 75%, respectively, compared with 94.5%, 90%, 84.6%, 91.7%, and 90.6%, respectively, for PET/CT. ConclusionPET/CT enhances the accuracy and specificity of diagnosis of CRCRa. PET/CT grows to reach prominent roles for imaging and restaging of patients after colorectal carcinoma resection.