Usefulness of a global rating change scale for contact lens discomfort evaluation

Abstract

ObjectivesTo evaluate the usefulness of a global rate of change scale (GRCS) to detect variations in contact lens discomfort (CLD). MethodsSymptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers were recruited according to the ‘Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8’ (CLDEQ-8). At the baseline visit, subjects scored their comfort following insertion of their habitual CL using a 0–100 visual analogue scale (VAS). After 4–10 h of CL wear, comfort was again self-evaluated with the VAS and with a GRCS (range, −50 to +50). Then, a daily disposable CL (DDCL) was fitted. After one month of DDCL wear, a follow-up visit was conducted where the same evaluations as the baseline visit were performed. Changes in comfort were estimated using a Student's t-test for normal variables and the Friedman test for multiple comparisons of non-parametric variables. Internal responsiveness was measured by calculating the standardised response mean. Agreement between scales was estimated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). ResultsTwenty-nine (22 females and 7 males) CL wearers with a mean age of 23.4 ± 5.4 years participated in the study. There was a significant decrease in comfort at both visits detected by the GRCS (baseline = −13.58 ± 17.48, p < 0.001; follow up = −6.86 ± 12.69, p = 0.007). However, the VAS did not detect that change, either at baseline (insertion = 64.28 ± 18.72 vs removal = 52.89 ± 17.64, p = 1.000) or follow-up visit (insertion = 81.97 ± 12.91 vs removal = 76.48 ± 16.02, p = 1.000). Comfort at insertion and removal times was significantly higher with the DDCL (p = 0.008 at insertion and p = 0.004 at removal). The standardised response mean was greater with the GRCS than the VAS at baseline (0.78 vs 0.63) and follow-up (0.54 vs 0.37) visits. Agreement between both scales was moderate and significant (p < 0.001) for both visits, ICC: 0.674 (95 % confidence interval (CI):0.411–0.833) (baseline) and 0.652 (95 % CI:0.377–0.821) (follow-up visit). ConclusionsThe GRCS can detect slight changes in CL wear comfort and shows higher responsiveness than the VAS. This subjective scale can allow detection of changes in comfort in a simple and quick way.