Abstract

Detailed topographic maps covering a high elevation Bighorn-Powder River drainage divide segment in the southern Bighorn Mountains are used to test a recently proposed regional geomorphology paradigm. Fundamentally different from the commonly accepted paradigm the new paradigm predicts immense south-oriented continental ice sheet melt water floods once flowed across what is now the entire Missouri River drainage basin, in which the high Bighorn Mountains are located. Such a possibility is incompatible with commonly accepted paradigm expectations and previous investigators have interpreted Bighorn Mountains geomorphic history quite differently. The paradigm test began in the high glaciated Bighorn Mountains core area where numerous passes, or divide crossings, indicate multiple and sometimes closely spaced streams of water once flowed across what is now the Bighorn-Powder River drainage divide. To the south of the glaciated area, but still in a Precambrian bedrock region, the test found the roughly adjacent and parallel south-oriented North Fork Powder River and Canyon Creek headwaters located on opposite sides of the Bighorn-Powder River drainage divide with North Fork Powder River headwaters closely linked to a 300-meter deep pass through which south-oriented water had probably flowed. Shallower divide crossings located further to the south suggest diverging and converging streams of water once flowed not only across the Bighorn-Powder River drainage divide, but also across Powder River and Bighorn River tributary drainage divides. The paradigm test also found published geologic maps and reports showing the presence of possible flood transported and deposited alluvium. While unable to determine the water source, the new paradigm test did find evidence that large south-oriented floods had crossed what was probably a rising Bighorn Mountains mountain range.

Highlights

  • 1.1 Statement of the ProblemThomas Kuhn (1970) describes scientific paradigms as frameworks of rules and ideas that define and govern a scientific discipline’s research efforts

  • The systematic study was repeated during the 2011-2013 time period using National Geographic TOPO software and maps with more than 500 detailed research notes in blog format describing more than 4000 different Missouri River drainage basin drainage divide origins being posted at gemorphologyresearch.com

  • Water flowing across what is the high Bighorn Mountains crest ridge, which is the Bighorn-Powder River drainage divide, eroded the 300-meter deep valley remnant preserved between Bighorn Peak and Loaf Mountain

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1.1 Statement of the ProblemThomas Kuhn (1970) describes scientific paradigms as frameworks of rules and ideas that define and govern a scientific discipline’s research efforts. To become successful a scientific paradigm must enable that discipline’s investigators to explain their observed evidence and to develop productive new research opportunities. Paradigm change is not accomplished, but from time to time anomalous evidence appears that a discipline’s accepted paradigm cannot explain. Kuhn suggests such anomalous evidence is dealt with in one of three ways: first, the paradigm rules and assumptions eventually explain the evidence and the accepted paradigm continues without serious interruption; second, the anomalous evidence is labelled and shelved for future consideration; and third, a new and fundamentally different discipline paradigm emerges and a battle develops over which paradigm should be used. To be accepted a new paradigm must demonstrate an ability to explain previously unexplained evidence

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.