Use of visual screening methods for cervical cancer screening

Abstract

This article has considered recent advances in visual screening methods. Devices that use electro-optical sensors offer great potential in various clinical roles, but considerable additional work is required to develop these devices and it is unlikely that they will come into widespread clinical use in the next 5 years. In contrast numerous studies, demonstrate that simple visual screening methods, such as DVI, have a sensitivity for the detection of women with biopsy-confirmed high-grade SIL (CIN 2,3) and cancer that is equivalent to that of conventional cervical cytology. The primary disadvantage of the simple visual screening methods is poor specificity. These methods classify up to 30% of all women screened as being test positive and as a result new strategies toward managing DVI positive women must be developed before simple visual screening methods can be adopted for routine screening. Enhanced visual methods that use cervicography and speculoscopy may be more specific and improve detection of biopsy-confirmed SIL, but the added time and expense to perform either of these methodologies must be considered and justified. Currently numerous studies are evaluating the best strategies for incorporating visual screening methods into cervical cancer screening programs. In the near future we should be able to determine whether these approaches should be incorporated into routine clinical care.