Abstract

Traditionally, the fibula free flap has been raised by electrocautery and sharp dissection with clipping and tying of vessels. Use of the ultrasonic scalpel has been proposed to be a faster, more hemostatic, and less traumatic method of harvest. We performed a retrospective chart review of 58 patients who underwent fibula free flap reconstruction between 2007 and 2010. The main outcome measures were blood loss, operative time, and flap harvest time. Use of the ultrasonic shears was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss, operative time, or flap harvest time. However, the flap harvest time did trend toward statistical significance (p = 0.073). Use of distribution-based effect sizes demonstrated a moderate clinically important difference in favor of the ultrasonic shears for both operative time and flap harvest time. The use of ultrasonic shears is comparable to traditional methods of fibula free flap harvest and can be considered an alternative method of harvest.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call