Abstract

This work assessed the quality of wind speed estimates in Uruguay. These estimates were obtained using the Weather Research and Forecast Model Data Assimilation System (WRF-DA) to assimilate wind speed measurements from 100 m above the ground at two wind farms. The quality of the estimates was assessed with an anemometric station placed between the wind farms. The wind speed estimates showed low systematic errors at heights of 87 and 36 m above the ground. At both levels, the standard deviation of the total errors was approximately 25% of the mean observed speed. These results suggested that the estimates obtained could be of sufficient quality to be useful in various applications. The assimilation process proved to be effective, spreading the observational gain obtained at the wind farms to lower elevations than those at which the assimilated measurements were taken. The smooth topography of Uruguay might have contributed to the relatively good quality of the obtained wind estimates, although the data of only two stations were assimilated, and the resolution of the regional atmospheric simulations employed was relatively low.

Highlights

  • This work assessed the quality of wind speed estimates in Uruguay

  • This work evaluated the use of techniques for assimilation of data from field measurements into initial conditions of atmospheric numerical simulations in order to obtain wind estimates in Uruguay, at heights of 100 m above the ground and lower

  • The data was assimilated into initial conditions for the Weather Research and Forecast regional model (WRF) of the National Center of Atmospheric Research (NCAR), [1] using the module for data assimilation included in this model, the WRF-DA module [2]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This work assessed the quality of wind speed estimates in Uruguay. These estimates were obtained using the Weather Research and Forecast Model Data Assimilation System (WRF-DA) to assimilate wind speed measurements from 100 m above the ground at two wind farms. The wind speed estimates showed low systematic errors at heights of 87 and 36 m above the ground. At both levels, the standard deviation of the total errors was approximately 25% of the mean observed speed. The standard deviation of the total errors was approximately 25% of the mean observed speed These results suggested that the estimates obtained could be of sufficient quality to be useful in various applications. The smooth topography of Uruguay might have contributed to the relatively good quality of the obtained wind estimates, the data of only two stations were assimilated, and the resolution of the regional atmospheric simulations employed was relatively low

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call