Abstract

AbstractAmong several methods employed for sizing thickeners available in the literature, the Kynch, Biscaia Jr., Talmadge and Fitch, Roberts, Coe and Clevenger, and Oltmann methods use experimental data from sedimentation curves and graphical approaches. By using the Weibull distribution, it is possible to represent sedimentation curves with algebraic equations, which does not require the use of graphical approaches and provides more accuracy and speed for sizing calculations. In the present work, the main objective is the development of a set of equations for sizing continuous thickeners, for six conventional methods found in the literature, using the Weibull model. A comparative analysis of calculated and literature diameters for each graphical method presented variations between 0.73% and 8.93%. The use of the Weibull model presented the best accuracy for the Biscaia Jr. method, with a 0.73% average absolute error.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.