Abstract

BackgroundThe ability to accurately assess the level of immunosuppression in HIV+ patients in the emergency department (ED) is often limited and can affect management of these patients. ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and CD4 count in HIV patients admitted through the ED with pneumonia and how utilization of this relationship may affect early consideration and evaluation of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PCP). MethodsRetrospective multicenter 5-year study of HIV+ patients with an ICD-9 diagnosis of pneumonia. Included patients had an ALC measured on ED presentation and a CD4 count measured in < 24 h. A receiver operator curve (ROC), decision plot analysis, and McNemar test of proportions were used to characterize the relationship between study variables. ResultsSix hundred eighty six patients were enrolled, 23.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 20.2–26.1) were diagnosed with PCP. The geometric mean CD4 count and ALC were 81 and 1089, respectively. The correlation between ALC and CD4 was r = 0.60 (95% CI 0.55–65, p < 0.01). The ROC was 0.78 (0.75–0.82). An ALC < 1700 cells/mm3 had a sensitivity of 84% (95% CI 80–87) and specificity of 55% (95% CI 48–70) for a CD4 < 200 cells/mm3. An ALC threshold of 1700 cells/mm3 would have identified 86% of patients with PCP but falsely identified 2.5 patients without PCP for every one accurately identified. ConclusionThe ALC threshold of 1700 cells/mm3 retains significant discriminatory value and would moderately improve identification of patients with a CD4 < 200 cells/mm3 but is not likely to be reliable as the sole method of early recognition and evaluation of PCP.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.