Abstract

Walking stability has been assessed through gait variability or existing biomechanical measures. However, such measures are unable to quantify the instantaneous risk of loss-of-balance as a function of gait parameters, body sway, and physiological and perturbation conditions. This study aimed to introduce and evaluate novel biomechanical measures for loss-of-balance under various perturbed walking conditions. We introduced the concept of ‘Extended Feasible Stability Region (ExFSR)’ that characterizes walking stability for the duration of an entire step. We proposed novel stability measures based on the proximity of the body’s centre of mass (COM) position and velocity to the ExFSR limits. We quantified perturbed walking of fifteen non-disabled individuals and three individuals with a disability, and calculated our proposed ExFSR-based measures. 17.2% (32.5%) and 26.3% (34.0%) of the measured trajectories of the COM position and velocity during low (high) perturbations went outside the ExFSR limits, for non-disabled and disabled individuals, respectively. Besides, our proposed measures significantly correlated with measures previously suggested in the literature to assess gait stability, indicating a similar trend in gait stability revealed by them. The ExFSR-based measures facilitate our understanding on the biomechanical mechanisms of loss-of-balance and can contribute to the development of strategies for balance assessment.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.