Abstract

A great mystery in the mechanism of phospholipase A2 (PLA2) and many other lipolytic enzymes is the "interfacial activation" induced by micellar but not monomeric substrates. Equally mysterious is the lack of interfacial activation in bee venom PLA2, as opposed to PLA2s from pancreas and other sources. We have probed these problems using the conformationally restricted short-chain cyclopentano-analogues of diacylphosphatidylcholine (Cp-DCnPC, all-trans isomer). In the reaction catalyzed by bovine pancreatic PLA2, Cp-DC8PC behaved differently from DC8PC in that its monomers and micelles showed comparable activities (but lower than the activity of DC8PC). This result suggests that the activity of PLA2 can be regulated by substrate conformation and supports the "substrate conformation model" (Wells, M. A. (1974) Biochemistry 13, 2248-2257), but raises a question as to whether Cp-DC8PC mimics monomers or micelles of DC8PC. Conformational analysis by 1H NMR revealed that monomeric Cp-DC8PC was conformationally restricted near the carbonyl region, a property characteristic of micelles. Thus, monomeric CP-DC8PC can be considered as a conformational analogue of micelles, but the important structural feature lies in the CH2COO region instead of the glycerol backbone. CP-DC8PC was then used to test a previous proposal that the bee venom PLA2 hydrolyzes monomers but not micelles (which would predict little or no activity for Cp-DC8PC since its conformation is micelle-like whether below or above its critical micelle concentration). The results showed that Cp-DC8PC is a relatively good substrate for the bee venom PLA2 in comparison with the pancreatic PLA2. This and other evidence together suggest that the bee venom PLA2 is not sensitive to the conformation of monomeric and micellar substrates and hydrolyzes both monomers and micelles. The results in both PLA2s demonstrate the usefulness of cyclopentano-phospholipids in probing the mechanism of phospholipases and the roles of substrate conformation in the catalysis of PLA2.

Highlights

  • IntroductionIn the reaction catalyzed bybovine pancreatic PLAP, recent reviews, see Verheij et al, 1981; Volwerkand de Haas, Cp-DCsPC behaved differently fromDCePC in thatits monomers and micelles showed comparable activities (but lower than the activity of DCePC)

  • Conformational analysis by‘H NMR revealed that monomeric Cp-DCsPC was conformationally re

  • The results showed that Cp-DCsPC is a relatively good substrate to the substrate conformation model, PLAB interacts with aggregated or monomeric substratein essentially the same manner

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the reaction catalyzed bybovine pancreatic PLAP, recent reviews, see Verheij et al, 1981; Volwerkand de Haas, Cp-DCsPC behaved differently fromDCePC in thatits monomers and micelles showed comparable activities (but lower than the activity of DCePC). This result suggests that the activitoyf PLAS can be regulatedby substrateconformationandsupportsthe“substrate conformation model” An interface-induced conformational change is not functionally significant, and theso called “interfacial activation”is due to a conformational change of the substrate in an interface which allows for a higher fraction of productive interactions with the enzyme

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call