Abstract
As noted by Knaak, information provided to parents about infant feeding in recent decades has become ‘more a tool for persuasion than a tool for education.’ Some health professionals advocate that providers and information for new and expecting parents emphasise the ‘risks of formula feeding’ rather than ‘benefits of breastfeeding.’ Limited systematic research suggests this shift is not changing parental behaviour. The present study assesses the degree to which ‘risk’ language appears in online breastfeeding promotional materials published by governmental health departments in the US Over 200 documents and webpages promoting breastfeeding were analysed for inclusion of ‘risk’ language. About 30 per cent of agencies and 13 per cent of documents and webpages promoting breastfeeding were found to contain such language. Materials published by nongovernmental entities (linked through agency sites) were significantly more likely to include risk language compared to governmental sites. This assessment provides context for the existing discourse regarding promotion of breastfeeding by emphasising health risks. The significance of these findings for respectful advocacy is discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
