Abstract
A clinical prospective examination of 90 women with complete pregnancy and indications for labor induction because of unsatisfactory maturity of uterus cervix has been made. The aim was to create a comparative analysis of efficiency of intravaginal introduction of prostaglandin synthetic analogue E1 misoprostol («Sytotec») and intracervical introduction of prostaglandin E2 dinoprostone («Prepidil» gel) for uterus cervix preparation and labor induction at complete pregnancy. Misoprostol in a dose of 25 mkg has been introduced to pregnant women of the 1 group (n=44), every 4 hours not more than 3 times. In case of discharge of waters or labor activity the second introduction has not been done. Dinoprostone has been introduced intracervically in a single dose to pregnant women of the 2 group (n=46). The use of misoprostol has been accompanied by spontaneous beginning of labor activity by 2 times more often than the use of dinoprostone. The quantity of vaginal births within 12 and 24 hours of observation has been surely greater and the duration of time between the beginning of introduction and labor has been surely smaller in the group of women received misoprostol as compared to the one received dinoprostone. It has not been revealed any differences between examined groups by the frequency of uterus hyperstimulation symptom development, labor duration, frequency of abdominal and vaginal labor, as well as perinatal outcomes.
Highlights
С целью сравнительного анализа эффективности интравагинального введения синтетического аналога простагландина Е1 мизопростола («Сайтотек») и интрацервикального введения простагландина Е2 динопростона для подготовки шейки матки и индукции родов при доношенной беременности проведено клиническое проспективное исследование 90 женщин с доношенной беременностью, имеющих показания для родовозбуждения при неудовлетворительной зрелости шейки матки
The aim was to create a comparative analysis of efficiency of intravaginal introduction of prostaglandin synthetic analogue E1 misoprostol («Sytotec») and intracervical introduction of prostaglandin E2 dinoprostone («Prepidil» gel) for uterus cervix preparation and labor induction at complete pregnancy
Misoprostol in a dose of 25 mkg has been introduced to pregnant women of the 1 group (n=44), every 4 hours not more than 3 times
Summary
Применение синтетического аналога простагландина Е1 для подготовки шейки матки и индукции родов. С целью сравнительного анализа эффективности интравагинального введения синтетического аналога простагландина Е1 мизопростола («Сайтотек») и интрацервикального введения простагландина Е2 динопростона (гель «Препидил») для подготовки шейки матки и индукции родов при доношенной беременности проведено клиническое проспективное исследование 90 женщин с доношенной беременностью, имеющих показания для родовозбуждения при неудовлетворительной зрелости шейки матки. The quantity of vaginal births within 12 and 24 hours of observation has been surely greater and the duration of time between the beginning of introduction and labor has been surely smaller in the group of women received misoprostol as compared to the one received dinoprostone. Цель исследования — провести сравнительный анализ эффективности интравагинального введения синтетического аналога ПГЕ1 мизопростола («Сайтотек») и интрацервикального введения ПГЕ2 динопростона (гель «Препидил») для подготовки шейки матки и индукции родов при доношенной беременности
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
