Use of Oncotype vs. Breast Cancer Index (BCI) for extended endocrine therapy decisions: A single center analysis in stage IA hormone receptor positive breast cancer.

Abstract

e13083 Background: Extended Endocrine Therapy (EET) for hormone receptor positive HER-2 negative early-stage breast cancer reduces late recurrence risks but raises concerns about toxicity. Biomarker tests like the Breast Cancer Index (BCI) are vital for identifying patients who could benefit from continued ET, reassuring others against unnecessary extension. This study evaluates prognostic implications for both Oncotype Dx (Recurrence score, RS) and BCI amidst concerns about added testing costs in patients with early stage, estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. Methods: This is a single institution retrospective review of Stage IA ER positive HER-2 negative breast cancer patients who underwent both Oncotype Dx and BCI testing from January 2021 to December 2023. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) was used to assess the linear relationship between the assays (p<0.05 for significance), analysis was performed with SAS software, version 9.4. Results: Fifty-eight patients with Stage IA ER positive HER-2 negative breast cancer who had both Oncotype and BCI results were identified (100% female; mean age 72.2 years [54-87]). After a median followed up of 72 months (63-75), no systemic or locoregional recurrences were reported. A low positive correlation between Oncotype and BCI was observed across the entire cohort (r=0.4058; p=0.0016). However, subgroup analysis showed no significant correlations: Oncotype <11 (n=17; r=0.2415; p=0.3504), Oncotype ≤18 (n=43; r=0.0914; p=0.5600), Oncotype <26 (n=51; r=0.2530; p=0.0733); Oncotype ≥26 (n=7; r=-0.5634; p=0.1878). Correlation was also not found in patients with Grade 1 tumor (n=16; r=0.3138; p=0.2365). Thirty-nine patients (67.24%) had their treatment recommendation changed based on BCI results. Side effects from ET affected 15 patients (25.86%) and included arthralgias (60%, n=9), hot flashes (26.67%, n=4), depression (13.33%, n=2), insomnia (6.67%, n=1), and others (53.3%, n=8). Twenty-two patients (37.93%) developed new osteopenia, and 6 (10.34%) new osteoporosis while on EET. Eight patients (13.79%) had ET interruption during their treatment course. Conclusions: Despite inclination towards cost-saving measures, Oncotype DX may be more useful to give prognosis in the early adjuvant period whereas BCI is more useful to evaluate late recurrence risk. Low or high Oncotype scores and tumor grade may not align with BCI findings. Considering the importance of managing toxicity against the risk of late recurrence, incorporating BCI testing can enhance EET recommendations, even for Stage I, node-negative, ER positive patients.