Abstract

In principle the conductivity of the cuprate superconductors can be obtained from reflectivity measurements using the Kramers-Kronig-transform technique. However, at low temperatures and for frequencies below \ensuremath{\sim}300 ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$ the reflectivities of materials such as ${\mathrm{YBa}}_{2}$${\mathrm{Cu}}_{3}$${\mathrm{O}}_{7}$ are close to unity. Uncertainty in the precise signal level corresponding to unity reflectivity and a lack of knowledge of the reflectivity below the lowest measured frequency cause this method to become unreliable. To address this problem we have used a bolometric technique and a resonant technique to obtain accurate submillimeter and microwave data for the residual losses in epitaxial thin films of ${\mathrm{YBa}}_{2}$${\mathrm{Cu}}_{3}$${\mathrm{O}}_{7}$ at low temperatures. The Kramers-Kronig analysis of our data is in good agreement with results from fitting our data to simple weakly coupled grain and two-fluid models for the a-b plane conductivity. However, below 450 ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$ it is in disagreement with some published results of other workers obtained from Kramers-Kronig analysis of reflectivity data. To understand this discrepancy we analyze how the conductivity determined by the Kramers-Kronig-transform technique depends on some commonly used low-frequency extrapolations of reflectivity data.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.