Abstract
ABSTRACTThe use of Individual Differences Scaling in sensory studies has been limited because the number of pairwise comparisons in a complete design can be prohibitively large. This study examines the effect of different levels of error and missing data on recovery of true structure by Individual Difference Scaling for the normal range of assessors and stimuli (8–16) used by sensory workers. Recovery was very good for a missing value rate of 20%. It was good for 40% provided that the number of stimuli was high, but deteriorated sharply at 60% missing data. The effect of superimposing random error on to the true structure indicated that a large error rate gave poor recovery. It is concluded that up to 40% of the distances in a complete design could be excluded, provided that replicate measurements indicated error levels were not severe.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
