Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the ability of an eye-tracker to detect changes in vigilance performance compared to the common method of using cerebral blood flow velocities (CBFV). Sixteen subjects completed this study. Each participant performed a 40-minute vigilance task while wearing an eye-tracker and a transcranial doppler (TCD) on each of four separate days. The results indicate that percentage of eye closure (PERCLOS) measured by the eye-tracker increased as vigilance performance declined and right CBFV as measured by the TCD decreased as performance declined. The results indicate that PERCLOS (left eye r=-.72 right eye r=-.67) more strongly correlated with changes in performance when compared to CBFV (r=.54). We conclude that PERCLOS, as measured by a head-worn eye tracking system, may serve as a compelling alternative (or supplemental) indicator of impending or concurrent performance declines in operational settings where sustained attention or vigilance is required. Such head-worn or perhaps even offbody oculometric sensor systems could potentially overcome some of the practical disadvantages inherent with TCD data collection for operational purposes. If portability and discomfort challenges with TCD can be overcome, both TCD and eye tracking might be advantageously combined for even greater performance monitoring than can be offered by any single device.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.