Abstract

Administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation accelerates neutrophil recovery and decreases hospitalization time. The optimal timing for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor infusion remains unknown. In this retrospective, case-controlled, two-armed study, we reviewed our experience at Hahnemann University Hospital to determine whether initiating granulocyte colony-stimulating factor infusions on posttransplant day 0 versus day 8 affects neutrophil recovery time, posttransplant discharge date, total hospital days after high-dose chemotherapy, and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. All patients hospitalized between 1994 and 1998 at Hahnemann University Hospital, Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, who underwent high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation and received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor either on posttransplant day 0 (16 patients) or day 8 (16 patients). The day 0 and day 8 groups had no statistically significant differences in age, sex, weight, height, body surface area, disease characteristics, pretransplant harvesting or conditioning regimens, or transplant CD34+ cell counts. Our main outcome measure was the mean time to reach absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to 0.5 x 10(9)/l, the number of hospital days after transplant, and the total hospital days. The mean days to neutrophil recovery (10.56 versus 9.68, p = 0.48), posttransplant hospital days (13.62 versus 12.81, p = 0.39), and total hospital days (20.25 versus 20.25, p = 1.00) were not significantly different between day 8 and day 0 groups, respectively. No significant effects on neutrophil recovery time, posttransplant hospital days, or total hospital days were observed with the initial granulocyte colony-stimulating factor infusion on day 0 versus day 8 after transplant. Delayed administration may allow substantial cost savings (US$200 x 8 approximately equal to US $1,600 per patient) without affecting clinical outcome. More studies are needed to determine whether greater delay is feasible.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.