Abstract

BackgroundAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common and disabling disease with high rates of mortality and morbidity. The role of steroids in treating ARDS remains controversial. We aim to examine the evidence behind using glucocorticoids in the management of ARDS from the available studies.MethodsWe performed a literature review of major electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing glucocorticoids versus placebo in treating patients with ARDS. Our primary outcome was hospital mortality. Other outcomes included ICU mortality, number of ventilator-free days at day 28, incidence of nosocomial infections, and hyperglycemia. We performed a meta-analysis using a random effects model to calculate risk ratios (RR) and mean difference (MD) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). A subsequent trial sequential analysis was performed to examine the strength of evidence and to guard against statistical type I and type II errors for our results.ResultsEight RCTs were included in the final analysis totaling of 1091 patients, with a mean age of 57 ± 16, and 56.2% were male. In our pooled analysis, use of glucocorticoids was associated with a significant reduction in hospital mortality (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.64–0.98; P = 0.03) and ICU mortality (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.42–0.97; P = 0.04). Furthermore, glucocorticoid use was associated with an increased number of ventilator-free days at day 28 (MD 4.06 days; 95% CI 2.66–5.45; P < 0.01). Regarding adverse events, glucocorticoids use was not associated with an increased risk for nosocomial infections (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68–1.00; P = 0.05); however, it was associated with an increased risk of hyperglycemia (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.01–1.24; P = 0.04). In our trial sequential analysis, the required diversity-adjusted information size (sample size = 2692 patients) was not reached, and the evidence was insufficient from the available RCTs.ConclusionAmong patients with ARDS, use of glucocorticoids is associated with a significant reduction in mortality and duration of mechanical ventilation, without increased risk of hospital-acquired infections. However, based on a trial sequential analysis, these findings may be secondary to a false-positive (type I) error. Further studies are needed for a firm conclusion with guarding against possible statistical errors.

Highlights

  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common and disabling syndrome with high rates of mortality and morbidity

  • An analysis involving individual patients’ data of four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed significant improvement in mortality and several other clinical outcomes with glucocorticoid use in ARDS patients [5]. Their use in ARDS is still controversial, and the current society of critical care medicine guidelines have conditional recommendations for the use of glucocorticoids in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS [6]. In this meta-analysis, we aim to examine the efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids in ARDS, as well as examine the strength of current evidence based on the available RCTs by performing a trial sequential analysis

  • We found that late administration of glucocorticoids was not associated with improved outcomes despite lower risk ratio (0.52) but with a high p value, a finding that is limited by the low number of patients and studies in this subgroup (2 studies, 204 patients)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common and disabling syndrome with high rates of mortality and morbidity. An analysis involving individual patients’ data of four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed significant improvement in mortality and several other clinical outcomes with glucocorticoid use in ARDS patients [5]. Their use in ARDS is still controversial, and the current society of critical care medicine guidelines have conditional recommendations for the use of glucocorticoids in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS [6]. We aim to examine the evidence behind using glucocorticoids in the management of ARDS from the available studies

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.