Abstract

Introduction More than 40 years after the launch of elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) as a golden standard of the treatment of some fractures in children and adolescents. Material and methods This review is based on answers to five essential questions: The position of ESIN compared with other methods of treatment; The choice of the implants; The indications for ESIN today; How to avoid complications as much as possible? Do we remove the implants or not? Results The aspects of biomechanics, design, indications for ESIN in comparison to other treatment, surgical techniques depending on fractured bones, complications are presented in the article. Conclusion ESIN is an excellent method to fix long bone fractures in children and adolescents. Top one is definitively the fractures of both bones of the forearm, then the diaphyseal fractures of the femur and the tibia before the age to be eligible for a locking nail. However, some unstable fractures cannot be treated conservatively or with a locking nail, and an ESIN remains unstable. In these cases, we are allowed to propose to add an external fixator for 4 to 6 weeks, waiting for a good stabilisation of the fracture.

Highlights

  • More than 40 years after the launch of elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) as a golden standard of the treatment of some fractures in children and adolescents

  • ESIN is mini-invasive with a respect of the bone callus repair For many years, the conservative treatments of fractures have demonstrated that several factors lead to a bone union after fractures in children: 1) the positive role of the hematoma which is not evacuated; 2) the positive effect of the periosteum which is not altered by a surgical approach; 3) the alternative micro movements in compression and distraction which are favourable to develop external callus (Fig. 1); 4) the absence of physis injuries and of growth disturbances; 5) and, in addition, a prompt return at school, low hospitalisation costs, and an early return to sport activities

  • If some external fixators like circular fixators developed by Professor Ilizarov lead to excellent results [2], we admit that the scars, the risks of pin track infections and the presence of the ex-fix are disadvantages to treat fractures compared to ESIN

Read more

Summary

Introduction

More than 40 years after the launch of elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) as a golden standard of the treatment of some fractures in children and adolescents. Results The aspects of biomechanics, design, indications for ESIN in comparison to other treatment, surgical techniques depending on fractured bones, complications are presented in the article. Conclusion ESIN is an excellent method to fix long bone fractures in children and adolescents. Some unstable fractures cannot be treated conservatively or with a locking nail, and an ESIN remains unstable. In these cases, we are allowed to propose to add an external fixator for 4 to 6 weeks, waiting for a good stabilisation of the fracture.

INTRODUCTION
MATERIAL AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Historical approaches
Titanium or SS?
The shape of the tip
Diaphysis of the tibia
Fracture of the humerus diaphysis
Mal-union Mal-union is one of the most frequent complications of ESIN
Delayed- and non-union
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call