Abstract

Background: Smoke-free air policies exist to protect users and nonusers from exposure to tobacco smoke. Although electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) may expose passerby to nicotine and particulate matter, few US states regulate indoor use of ENDS. The purpose of this study was to investigate reported rationales for ENDS use and reported ENDS use in public smoke-free places by dual cigarette/ENDS users. Methods: A population of ENDS/cigarette co-users (n = 2051) was drawn from Wave 2 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) dataset (2014–2015). Harm reduction beliefs and cessation behavior of co-users were investigated as predictors of ENDS use in public smoke-free places using logistic regression. Results: Fifty-eight percent of dual users reported past 30-day ENDS use in public smoke-free places. Reported use of ENDS to cut down on cigarette smoking (OR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.86, 3.05), as an alternative to quitting tobacco (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.37, 2.13), or because of belief that ENDS help people to quit cigarettes (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.20, 1.92) were significantly associated with increased odds of ENDS use in smoke-free places. Conclusions: Beliefs that ENDS were useful as cessation tools or posed modified risk to users and nonusers were associated with elevated odds of use ENDS in locations where conventional tobacco is prohibited. Due to limitations in the survey instrument, in-home ENDS use could not be directly assessed in this analysis. However, these self-reported findings suggest that use of ENDS in public places where cigarette use is prohibited is prevalent enough to be of concern for future regulation and enforcement efforts.

Highlights

  • Electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) use in smoke-free places has been previously assessed both as a primary motivator for ENDS use [1,2,3,4] as well as a reported condition under whichENDS are commonly used [5,6,7]

  • Use introduces nicotine, tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), fine particles, and heavy metals into the immediate environment, and there is a wide variety of ENDS which may emit disproportionate levels of these materials, their emission in ENDS aerosol may pose a risk of passive exposure to nearby nonusers [9,10,11,12,13,14]

  • A majority (n = 1621, 79.8%) of the study population agreed that they used ENDS because of a belief that ENDS products may pose less risk to nearby nonusers compared to cigarettes, compared to 424 participants (19.9%) that did not

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) use in smoke-free places has been previously assessed both as a primary motivator for ENDS use [1,2,3,4] as well as a reported condition under whichENDS are commonly used [5,6,7]. Electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) use in smoke-free places has been previously assessed both as a primary motivator for ENDS use [1,2,3,4] as well as a reported condition under which. The purpose of this study was to investigate reported rationales for ENDS use and reported ENDS use in public smoke-free places by dual cigarette/ENDS users. Harm reduction beliefs and cessation behavior of co-users were investigated as predictors of ENDS use in public smoke-free places using logistic regression. Results: Fifty-eight percent of dual users reported past 30-day ENDS use in public smoke-free places. Reported use of ENDS to cut down on cigarette smoking (OR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.86, 3.05), as an alternative to quitting tobacco (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.37, 2.13), or because of belief that ENDS help people to quit cigarettes

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call