Abstract
BackgroundCatheters are the most common cause of nosocomial infections and are associated with increased risk of mortality, length of hospital stay and cost. Prevention of infections and fast and correct diagnosis is highly important.MethodsIn this study traditional semiquantitative culture-dependent methods for diagnosis of bacteria involved in central venous catheter-related infections as described by Maki were compared with the following culture-independent molecular biological methods: Clone libraries, denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis, phylogeny and fluorescence in situ hybridization.ResultsIn accordance with previous studies, the cultivation of central venous catheters from 18 patients revealed that S. epidermidis and other coagulase-negative staphylococci were most abundant and that a few other microorganisms such as P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae occasionally were found on the catheters. The molecular analysis using clone libraries and sequencing, denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis and sequencing provided several important results. The species found by cultivation were confirmed by molecular methods. However, many other bacteria belonging to the phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes were also found, stressing that only a minor portion of the species present were found by cultivation. Some of these bacteria are known to be pathogens, some have not before been described in relation to human health, and some were not closely related to known pathogens and may represent new pathogenic species. Furthermore, there was a clear difference between the bacterial species found in biofilm on the external (exluminal) and internal (luminal) side of the central venous catheter, which can not be detected by Maki's method. Polymicrobial biofilms were observed on most of the catheters and were much more common than the cultivation-dependent methods indicated.ConclusionThe results show that diagnosis based on molecular methods improves the detection of microorganisms involved in central catheter-related infections. The importance of these microorganisms needs to be investigated further, also in relation to contamination risk from improper catheter handling, as only in vivo contaminants are of interest. This information can be used for development of fast and more reliable diagnostic tools, which can be used in combination with traditional methods.
Highlights
Catheters are the most common cause of nosocomial infections and are associated with increased risk of mortality, length of hospital stay and cost
The aim of this study was to compare the traditional, culture-dependent methods for the diagnosis of bacteria involved in central venous catheters (CVC)-infections with several culture-independent molecular methods to improve the diagnosis of CVC-related infections
Suspicion of infection was raised in cases of blood cultures with low-level pathogenic bacteria like coagulase negative staphylococci, positive blood cultures without another obvious focus of infection or cases with signs of infection at insertion site of the CVC
Summary
Catheters are the most common cause of nosocomial infections and are associated with increased risk of mortality, length of hospital stay and cost. There are, several problems with these methods for diagnosis It takes at least 2 days to obtain a result and as only the catheter tip is rolled back and forth on the agar plate, bacteria further up the catheter and on the internal site are not included in the analysis. It has been shown that many catheters appear sterile (are culture negative) after removal in cases where there were signs of infections [8,9]. These observations suggest additional diagnostic methods are necessary in cases where CVC-related infections are suspected
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.