Abstract

Covariance analysis from wavelet data in electroencephalographic records (EEG) was, for the first time, applied in this study to unravel information contained in the standard EEG, which was previously not taken into consideration due to the mathematical models used. The methodology discussed here could be applied to any neurological condition, including the important early stages of neurodegenerative diseases. In this study, we analyzed EEG from control (CL) participants and participants with diagnosed Parkinson’s disease (PD), who were age-matched women in an eyes-closed resting state, to test the model. PD is predicted to rise over the next decades as the population ages. Furthermore, women are more likely to undergo PD-related complications and worse disability than men. Two groups based on age were considered: under and over 60 years (PD patients <60 and >60; CL <60 and >60). Continuous Wavelet Transform and Cross Wavelet Transform were applied to determine patterns of global wavelet curves, main frequencies, and power analyses. Our results indicate that both CL age groups and PD patients <60 share a main α brainwave and PD patients >60 showed a main δ brainwave. Interestingly, power anomalies analyses show a decreasing anteroposterior gradient in CL, whereas it is increasing in PD patients, which was not previously observed. The brainwave power in PD patients <60 was higher in θ, α and β waves and in >60 group, the δ, θ and β brainwaves were predominant. This methodology offers a tool to reveal abnormal electrical brain activity unseen by a regular EEG analysis. The advent of new models that process EEG, such as the model proposed in this study, promotes renewed interest in electrophysiology of the brain to study the early stages of PD and improve understanding of the origin and progress of the disease.

Highlights

  • The diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease (PD) is mainly clinically based on the presence of cardinal motor symptoms

  • (3) The anteroposterior power gradient observed from the channel power anomalies proceeds from high to low power in the CL groups, and it was opposite in PD patients at any age studied

  • We reported the dominance of the α brainwave in PD patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The diagnosis of PD is mainly clinically based on the presence of cardinal motor symptoms. An accurate diagnosis can only be achieved conducting post-mortem pathological examinations [1] Several techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are helpful in confirming PD and rule out possible brain injury [2,3]. It is necessary to generate new medical tools to confirm the clinical diagnosis of PD and research new biomarkers that help in the early identification of premotor expressions of the disease. These new tools must be low cost, accessible, less stressful, and even remotely possible

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.