Abstract
Abstract Recent work has focussed attention on the use of a plethora of inorganic extracts for characterizing iron in soil. Concern surrounds the disparity between the amounts of iron extracted by these reagents and (i) field identification of podzolic or spodic horizons and (ii) iron mobilization processes thought to be occurring naturally in soils. It is suggested here that a simple, organic extractant may be more suitable, particularly for characterizing natural iron mobilisation processes. A synthetic catechol extractant is compared to the iron extractabilities of (i) standard inorganic methods using sodium dithionlte and sodium pyrophosphate and (ii) aqueous leaf leachates. Catechol solutions and aqueous solutions from fresh oak leaves and pine needles extracted similar amounts of iron from A and B horizons of acid brown forest soils in Leigh Woods, South West England. Potassium pyrophosphate solution extracted on average twice as much iron as the organic solutions and sodium dithionite solution diss...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.