Abstract

This article explores the use of artificial intelligence to help define the current test for copyright infringement. Currently, the test for copyright infringement requires the jury or a judge to determine whether the parties’ works are “substantially similar” to each other from the vantage point of the “ordinary observer.” This “substantial similarity” test has been criticized at almost every level due to its inconsistent nature. Artificial intelligence has evolved to the point where it can be used as a tool to resolve many of the current issues associated with the “substantial similarity” test. Specifically, courts would no longer have to rely on a battle of the experts or the use of lay observers to determine if a work is substantially similar to another work. Using a new test based on the “ordinary AI observer” copyright infringement can be established using a means that is both less biased and more fact driven while giving alleged infringers a means by which to check ex ante if their work could be infringing.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.