Abstract
Evidence on acute respiratory failure (ARF) from antipsychotics is scant, and only 1 population-based study examined this drug safety issue in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Antipsychotics have been frequently prescribed off-label in adults, but whether antipsychotic use carries an increased ARF risk among adult patients is uncertain. We adopted a nested case-control study analysing 716 493 adults aged ≥20 years, identified from the Taiwan nationwide healthcare claims records between January 2000 and December 2013. Among the study cohort, 7084 adults with ARF and 12,785 disease risk scored-matched randomly selected controls were analysed. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to estimate odds ratios of ARF with antipsychotic usages. Current, recent, and recent past use of antipsychotics was associated with a 2.33-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.06-2.64), 1.79-fold (95% CI = 1.43-2.25) and 1.41-fold (95% CI = 1.20-1.66) increased risk of ARF, respectively, compared with nonuse, while antipsychotics discontinued >90 days carried no risk. A dose-dependent association was observed with current therapy of antipsychotics (test for trend, P < .001), in which antipsychotic use at >1 defined daily dose yielded the highest risk of 6.53-fold (95% CI = 3.33-12.79). The findings were robust to using carbamazepine as an active comparator. Antipsychotic use was associated with an increased risk of ARF in adult patients. The risk was dose-dependent and markedly higher with current use of antipsychotic agents at doses of 1 defined daily dose and above, <10% of this cohort. Physicians should be vigilant about any respiratory symptoms in patients currently receiving antipsychotics at such dose.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.