Use of Anthropogenic Nest Materials by Black-Crested Titmice Along an Urban Gradient

Abstract

Abstract Numerous avian species use anthropogenic materials in constructing nests, particularly in urbanized environments. Researchers have demonstrated anthropogenic materials, including plastics, to have both beneficial and harmful effects on survival and reproduction. During the spring of 2018, we collected 45 black-crested titmouse Baeolophus atricristatus nests in San Marcos, Texas, with two objectives: 1) to assess and compare the mass and proportion of nest materials along an urban gradient and 2) to examine the relationship between nest materials, clutch size, and hatching success. We categorized each nest based on collection location as urban, residential, park, or rural and separated nest materials into six categories: leaves, snake skin, twigs, moss, plastic, and nonplastic artificial materials. We then compared raw mass and proportion of mass of each nest material among urbanization categories. Nests in the urban category were 1.6–1.9 times lighter in mass than nests in other locations along the urban gradient (P = 0.01) and contained 4–5 times greater proportion, but not mass, of plastic compared to nests in all other locations. Nests in residential areas contained the greatest mass of combined anthropogenic materials. Neither clutch size nor hatching success differed based on urbanization category, nest mass, or proportions of anthropogenic or natural nest materials. The differences in mass of nests and increased proportion of plastics could have been due to a lack of natural nesting materials; however, we did not estimate availability of nesting materials at any location. Results add to the growing literature that the use of anthropogenic materials in nests varies across an urban gradient, and the effect of anthropogenic materials on nesting parameters varies among species.