Abstract

BackgroundUnguided, web-based psychoeducational interventions are gaining interest as a way to reach patients while reducing pressure on clinical resources. However, there has been little research on how patients with cancer use these interventions.ObjectiveThe objective of this analysis was to evaluate how women newly diagnosed with breast cancer used the unguided web-based, psychoeducational distress self-management program CaringGuidance After Breast Cancer Diagnosis while enrolled in a pilot feasibility study.MethodsWomen with stage 0 to II breast cancer diagnosed within the prior three months were recruited from clinics primarily in the Northeastern United States for participation in a 12-week pilot study of CaringGuidance plus usual care versus usual care alone. Usage prompts included sets of emails sent weekly for 12 weeks; standardized congratulatory emails after every two hours of program use, and informative emails for each cognitive-behavioral exercise. Individual user activity on the site was automatically tracked by an analytics system and recorded directly in the CaringGuidance database.ResultsComplete usage data were available for 54 subjects. Ninety-eight percent of the intervention group logged into CaringGuidance independently at least once. Thirty-eight (70%) logged in during all three months, 15 (28%) were intermittent users, and one (2%) was a non-user. Users (n=53) averaged 15.6 (SD 9.85) logins. Mean logins were greatest in month 1 (7.26, SD 4.02) and declined in months 2 (4.32, SD 3.66) and month 3 (4.02, SD 3.82). Eleven (21%) used CaringGuidance with both the frequency and activity level intended at study outset, 9 (17%) exceeded intended frequency and activity (high-high users), and 10 (19%) were below expected usage on both login frequency and activity (low-low users). Low-low users and high-high users differed significantly (P<.001) in the total number of views and unique views of all program components. Change in depressive symptoms and the number of sessions (r=.351) and logins (r=.348) between study months 1 and 2 were significantly correlated (P=.018, .019). Higher baseline distress was associated with more unique views of program resources (r=.281, P=.043). Change in intrusive/avoidant thoughts from baseline to month 3, and the number of users’ unique exercise views were negatively correlated (r=–.319, P=.035) so that more unique exercise views, equated with greater decline in intrusive/avoidant thoughts from baseline to month 3.ConclusionsThese findings favor the hypothesis that the key ingredient is not the amount of program use, but each user’s self-selected activity within the program. More research is needed on the ideal ways to maintain use, and capture and define engagement and enactment of behaviors by people with cancer accessing unguided, self-management web-based programs.

Highlights

  • BackgroundInterest in unguided, web-based psychoeducational and behavioral interventions is growing due to ease of delivery and need for few clinical resources

  • J Med Internet Res 2020 | vol 22 | iss. 7 | e19734 | p. 1. These findings favor the hypothesis that the key ingredient is not the amount of program use, but each user’s self-selected activity within the program

  • It was expected that program use statistics for CaringGuidance might differ from unguided programs in which users access the program when treatment has been ongoing or is complete. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate how women newly diagnosed with breast cancer used the unguided web-based, psychoeducational distress self-management program CaringGuidance while enrolled in its first pilot study [13,14,15]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Web-based psychoeducational and behavioral interventions is growing due to ease of delivery and need for few clinical resources. The outcomes of such interventions, rely on patients accessing and using these programs independently [1]. Duration of use may be insufficient to describe the dose of web-based intervention necessary to achieve the intended benefit due to the inability to monitor off-line processing of program content, difficulty capturing the depth of online engagement [5,6], and not all users need to use the full program to attain their personal goals [7,8]. Web-based psychoeducational interventions are gaining interest as a way to reach patients while reducing pressure on clinical resources. There has been little research on how patients with cancer use these interventions

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call