Abstract

The incision and drainage of an inflamed or infected cutaneous abscess is a common medical intervention. Traditionally, common practice involves the insertion of a #11 (or similar) scalpel blade to incise an abscess, forming a small linear opening superficially, thus allowing the drainage of purulent contents over several days. Premature skin closure occurs frequently due to the linear wound edges yielding to close approximation. In an effort to avoid this complication, providers often choose to pack the wound. However, randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown no decrease in abscess recurrence rates with wound packing and further suggest postprocedural pain and costs are reduced without wound packing. 1 Mohamedahmed A.Y.Y. Zaman S. Stonelake S. et al. Incision and drainage of cutaneous abscess with or without cavity packing: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021; 406: 981-991 Crossref PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar ,2 Kessler D.O. Krantz A. Mojica M. Randomized trial comparing wound packing to no wound packing following incision and drainage of superficial skin abscesses in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012; 28: 514-517 Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.