Abstract

Abstract Introduction Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy (ACM) is defined as an arrhythmogenic heart muscle disorder not explained by ischemic, hypertensive, or valvular heart disease, which ranges from a systemic immunologic disorder such as cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), to a genetically determined one (arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy=ARVC). The aim of this study was to assess the utility of 18F-fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography /computer tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) in the differential diagnosis of ACM. Methods This study included 45 patients with a definite diagnosis of ARVC, in whom 18F-FDG-PET/CT was performed to screen for CS. Following a positive PET, diagnosis of CS was pursued according to the 2014 HRS consensus document. The patients were divided into two cohorts: the ARVC Cohort (ARVC-C) and the Cardiac Sarcoidosis Cohort (CS-C). Results All 45 patients received an 18F-FDG-PET/CT, of these 5 had a positive PET showing myocardial hypermetabolism. All 5 patients with a positive PET had a final diagnosis of histologically confirmed CS, as such the 18F-FDG-PET/CT had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. All 45 patients also received genetic testing (cardiomyopathy panel). In the ARVC-C, 23 (58%) patients harbored a pathogenic (P)/likely pathogenic (LP) variant (40% in PKP2). In the CS-C, 1 (20%) patient with histologically confirmed CS harbored a LP DSG2 variant. Nine (23%) subjects in the ARVC-C presented with atrioventricular block (AVB) (grade I) and 7 (18%) with QRS fragmentation, whereas 5 (100%) patients in the CS-C presented with AVB (grade I and higher) and 4 (80%) with QRS fragmentation. On TTE, left ventricular (LV) involvement was less frequent in the ARVC-C (LVEF 52.2 +/- 8.7%; wall motion abnormalities in 19 patients (48%)), while LV-involvement in the CS-C was more frequent (LVEF 44.0 +/- 16.2%; wall motion abnormalities in 3 (60%). On cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), late gadolinium enhancement was present in the ARVC-C in 14 (35%) in the RV and 15 (38%) in the LV, while it was present in 3 (60%) patients in the RV and 3 (60%) in the LV in the CS-C. Conclusions CS is an underdiagnosed clinical entity, which can be challenging to differentiate from ARVC. 18F-FDG-PET/CT has a high NPV to exclude CS in patients fulfilling definite ARVC criteria. Hence, we recommend to offer 18F-FDG-PET/CT to patients fulfilling definite ARVC criteria who present with AVB, QRS fragmentation, or biventricular involvement to screen for CS, especially to those who do not have an LP/P variant in the PKP2 gene.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.