Abstract
Usage metrics have become increasingly popular in scientometric with the advent of electronic resources. While most current researches relied on the usage data retrieved from English publishers. In this study, the usage data was extended to Chinese publishers. We collected and analyzed the usage data of six well-known Chinese OA (Open Access) journals in different fields from journals’ official websites and Chinese Academic Journals Full-text Database (CJFD) in China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). It was found that websites’ information architecture affected usage pattern. “Progressive rule”-based site guided users to view full-text articles more than download them and “parallel rule”-based site guided users to download full-text articles more than view them. CNKI proved its popularity in China. Although CNKI is a non-OA platform and has a time delay in indexing full-text articles, but they still attracted a large number of users. PDF tended to be the preferred format than HTML in most journals in the study. Also, CNKI citation were more skewedly distributed than usage data in most journals and it showed strong or moderate correlation between CNKI citation and CNKI full-text downloads in most journals. Finally, it depicted that usage data of most articles was at their peak around pagination month and at the bottom at very earlier or later months.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
