Abstract
Despite the increased worldwide interest in the university-sponsored technology incubator (USTI) as a mechanism for supporting the development of new technology-based firms (NTBFs), there is a dearth of empirical evidence on determinants of their best organization and management, and policy practices. This paper presents results from a national survey of more than 30 five-year and older American USTIs. The study focused on a sample comprising three state university-sponsored and three private university-sponsored facilities, generally viewed as being successful. The USTI practices and performance are explored using several key dimensions: organizational design, tenant performance review, funding sources, targeted technologies, strategic operational policies, services and their value-added component, and growth of the client firms. A comparative review of these dimensions reveals that there are no significant differences based on the type of sponsorship — state or private. It is concluded that, given the fuller utilization of university resources by the application of sound policies and business-management practices, the USTIs appear to provide an environment conducive to the development of NTBFs. Finally, it is recommended that universities must build their technology incubator programs by setting reasonable objectives and management policies that will encourage tangible results consistent with the new mission requirements of an entrepreneurial university.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.