Abstract
ABSTRACT PURPOSE: To determine the latest trends in refractive surgery in the United States. METHODS: All US members of the International Society of Refractive Surgery of the American Academy of Ophthalmology were mailed the 2003 refractive surgery survey dealing with volumes, types, preferences of refractive surgery performed, and use of new emerging technology. Questions regarding radial keratotomy (RK), astigmatic keratotomy (AK), limbal relaxing incisions (LRI), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), intracorneal ring segments (ICRS), laser thermokeratoplasty (LTK), conductive keratoplasty (CK), phakic intraocular lenses (PIOL), clear lens extractions (CLE), and scleral expansion (SE) procedures were examined in the survey. Use of lasers, microkeratomes, pupillometry instruments, postoperative medications, wavefront analyzers, topographers, etc were examined. RESULTS: In 2003, LASIK continued to dominate for refractive errors between -8.00 to +3 diopters. Surgeons are waiting on the PIOL for high myopes and are performing CLE for high hype ropes. Photorefractive keratectomy, LASIK, LASEK, CLE, PIOL, and CK appeared to have bright futures; whereas, RK, ICR, LTK and SE were on the decline. Bilateral LASIK at the same surgical session is offered by 98% of surgeons. VISX lasers are used 2:1 over all other lasers in the United States. Zeiss- Humph rey still dominates topographers at 37%. The Bausch & Lomb Hansatome (48%) leads microkeratomes. Surgeons are charging, on average, $300-$500 more per eye for custom ablations and these ablations have already been accepted and integrated into refractive practices. Comanaging of refractive surgery patients is significantly down from previous years. Fourth -gene ration fluoroquinolones overtook the postoperative antibiotic prescriptions, with prednisolone and fluoromethalone dominating as anti-inflammatories. CONCLUSIONS: Trends and changes as refractive surgery grows in the mainstream of ophthalmology in the United States continue to be elucidated by this professional organization survey. [J Refract Surg. 2005;21:87-91.]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.