US nulliparas' perceptions of roles and of the birth experience as predictors of their delivery preferences

Abstract

Objectiveto develop a model for understanding predictors of nulliparas' delivery preferences: provider type, setting, mode of delivery and the use/avoidance of pain medication. Designa cross-sectional, descriptive, self-administered, web-based survey. The sample was composed of nulliparous women aged 18–40, living in the US and pregnant at 20 or fewer weeks' gestation (n=344). Data were analysed using structural equation modelling. Findingswomen who regard their active participation as effective and essential to the childbearing process are more likely to prefer the care of a midwife, the home as the birth setting, vaginal delivery and the avoidance of pain medication compared to women who see their role as a passive one. When women perceive their provider's role to be more central to the delivery process than their own, they are likely to prefer the care of a physician and the hospital setting. If the provider's role is seen as a collaborative one, women are likelier to prefer midwifery care and planned home birth. The more painful and fearful a woman expects the delivery experience to be, the more likely she is to prefer a caesarean delivery to vaginal birth. Key conclusionswomen's perceptions of (a) their role in pregnancy and delivery, (b) their providers' role in assisting them and (c) the nature of the delivery experience are effective predictors of their delivery preferences. Implications for practiceproviders can help ensure that the informational resources that influence women's perceptions about delivery are factual and evidence-based.