Abstract
This study aims to compare the urologic injuries treated at Kuwait during the Gulf War with those recently reported by the United States urologic surgeons. Gunshot caused the majority of the injuries (58%) on our side of the battle compared with fragmentation injuries (83%) on the other side. We had statistically significant higher renal and ureteric injuries (14/35 compared with 5/30; p<0.04, Chi-square). This difference can be explained by the use of the flak jackets on the other side or the difference of the type of weapons used. Our management had a similar preservative approach. Only 4/12 of renal injuries (33%) had nephrectomy. Two ureteric injuries were missed by general surgeons which were successfully managed by the urologists. This study supports the presence of urologists within military surgical teams.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
