Urine sulfated and nonsulfated bile acids as a diagnostic test for liver disease in cats.

Abstract

Urine bile acid (UBA) tests reflecting "average" serum bile acid (SBA) concentrations may have greater practical utility than paired SBA samples in cats. This study evaluated whether urine sulfated bile acids (USBAs), urine nousulfated bile acids (UNSBAs), or a combined approach had a clinical utility equivalent to SBAs. Routine serum biochemistry tests, SBA concentrations, and urine samples were collected from 54 cats with hepatobiliary disease, 17 cats with nonhepatic disorders, and 8 healthy cats. UBAs were measured by a quantitative enzymatic colorimetric method, and results were normalized with urine creatinine (UCr) concentrations. Significantly higher values occurred in cats with liver disease than in cats without liver disease for USBA : UCr, UNSBA:UCr, and (USBA and UNSBA) : UCr, P < .05 each. UBA tests with diagnostic performance (sensitivity [SS], specificity [SP], and positive and negative predictive values [PV+ and PV-]) equivalent to SBAs were the UNSBA : UCr and the combined test (SS: 87, 87 versus 85; SP: 88, 88 versus 88; PV+: 96, 96 versus 96; PV-: 68, 65 versus 68; UNSBA : UCr, [USBA, and UNSBA]: UCr versus SBA, respectively). Clinical applications of the UNSBA : UCr or the combined (USBA and UNSBA) : UCr test should be useful as convenient diagnostic tests for identifying cats with liver disease and high SEA concentrations.