Abstract
We demonstrated previously that high serum calcitonin values in bronchogenic carcinoma are useful clinically as a parameter of progress of the disease and response to therapy. After developing a procedure for the measurement of calcitonin in urine, we studied serum and urine levels in 41 patients with lung cancer, using both a carboxyl terminus and a midportion recognizing antiserum. In general, midportion antiserum was more useful. Urine calcitonin measurements alone were superior to serum in terms of numbers of patients having increased values with one or both antisera (76% vs 46%). When both antisera were used to assay both serum and urine, 90% of patients had abnormal values. Once a tissue diagnosis has been established, the radioimmunoassay of urinary calcitonin offers a new dimension to the utility of this hormone as a marker for bronchogenic carcinoma.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
