Abstract

Osteoclastic activity is increased in tumor-associated hypercalcemia, which, thus, constitutes an excellent opportunity to assess new markers of the bone resorption rate. We have measured the fasting urinary excretion of the pyridinium cross-links pyridinoline (Pyr) and deoxypyridinoline (D-Pyr) in 36 hypercalcemic cancer patients (mean +/- SD, 3.2 +/- 0.4 mmol/L for total serum Ca and 1.66 +/- 0.24 mmol/L for Ca2+). Thirty-two of them were reevaluated after treatment with iv bisphosphonates. Urinary Pyr and D-Pyr levels were higher than those in healthy controls (130 +/- 62 vs. 40 +/- 19 nmol/mmol creatinine for Pyr and 20 +/- 15 vs. 6 +/- 3 nmol/mmol creatinine for D-Pyr; P less than 0.001 for both). This represented a mean 3.3-fold increase over the normal mean compared to 5.8- and 3.4-fold increases for fasting urinary Ca and hydroxyproline, respectively. Individual values were elevated in 83% and 75% of the cases for Pyr and D-Pyr compared to 97% and 83% for urinary Ca and hydroxyproline, respectively. The levels of Pyr and D-Pyr tended to be higher in patients with head and neck tumors than in patients with breast cancer. Urinary Pyr and D-Pyr correlated with each other (r = 0.72; P less than 0.001) and were highly correlated with hydroxyproline (r = 0.68 and 0.83, respectively; P less than 0.001 for both), but poorly correlated with urinary Ca (r = 0.21; P = NS and r = 0.42; P = 0.01, respectively), suggesting that these markers reflect different events of bone resorption. Similarly, after bisphosphonate therapy, urinary Pyr and D-Pyr levels fell by 31% and 50%, respectively, compared to 38% for hydroxyproline and 76% for urinary Ca. There was a significant correlation between posttreatment D-Pyr and serum Ca levels (r = 0.43; P less than 0.05). In summary, we found that the urinary excretion of Pyr and D-Pyr was markedly increased in hypercalcemic cancer patients and was adequately lowered by bisphosphonate therapy. The urinary excretion of the pyridinium cross-links, especially D-Pyr, should be helpful to specifically quantitate bone matrix resorption and monitor the inhibition of bone resorption in cancer patients receiving antiosteolytic drugs.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.