Abstract

Oxidative stress (OS) plays a marked role in aging and results from a variety of stressors, making it a powerful measure of health and a way to examine costs associated with life history investments within and across species. However, few urinary OS markers have been examined under field conditions, particularly in primates, and their utility to non-invasively monitor the costs of acute stressors versus the long-term damage associated with aging is poorly understood. In this study, we examined variation in 5 urinary markers of oxidative damage and protection under 5 validation paradigms for 37 wild, chimpanzees living in the Kibale National Park, Uganda. We used 924 urine samples to examine responses to acute immune challenge (respiratory illness or severe wounding), as well as mixed-longitudinal and intra-individual variation with age. DNA damage (8-OHdG) correlated positively with all other markers of damage (F-isoprostanes, MDA-TBARS, and neopterin) but did not correlate with protection (total antioxidant capacity). Within individuals, all markers of damage responded to at least one if not both types of acute infection. While OS is expected to increase with age, this was not generally true in chimpanzees. However, significant changes in oxidative damage were detected within past-prime individuals and those close to death. Our results indicate that OS can be measured using field-collected urine and integrates short- and long-term aspects of health. They further suggest that more data are needed from long-lived, wild animals to illuminate if common age-related increases in inflammation and OS damage are typical or recently aberrant in humans.

Highlights

  • As aerobic life forms use oxygen for energy metabolism, immune defense, and cell signaling, they are subject to cellular damage from byproducts of oxygen use, i.e. reactive oxygen species [1,2,3]

  • Isoprostanes, MDA-TBARS, and neopterin all positively correlated with 8-OHdG (Fig 1 and S5 Table)

  • Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) positively correlated with both neopterin and isoprostanes, and did not correlate with 8-OHdG or MDA-TBARS, counter to predictions that TAC would negatively correlate with markers of oxidative damage

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As aerobic life forms use oxygen for energy metabolism, immune defense, and cell signaling, they are subject to cellular damage from byproducts of oxygen use, i.e. reactive oxygen species [1,2,3]. The body balances reactive oxygen species with antioxidants and repair mechanisms, yet acute conditions can disrupt the balance to favor reactive oxidants, leading to a state of oxidative stress (OS, Finkel & Holbrook [4,5,6]).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.