Abstract
This paper offers collaborative governance as a concept of strengthening collaboration between institutions in the implementation of elections and local elections, namely by examining the phenomenon of electoral malpractice cases in the nomination stages in the 2019 NTT Provincial DPRD Election and the 2020 Sabu Raijua Regent and Deputy Regent Election. This study uses qualitative research methods descriptive with analysis techniques and data collection based on primary data and secondary data and literature study. The study results based on the case studies in this paper found that the concept of collaborative governance was able to overcome the weakness of the rules and the limitations of the authority of the election organizers at the election and regional head elections. This is evidenced by the potential for electoral malpractice in the nomination stage, which lies in the weakness of the rules for the verification mechanism for only administrative candidate requirements, so they are prone to be manipulated by candidates. At the same time, it is known that the validity and correctness of candidate requirements documents is the domain of authority of institutions outside the Organizing Institution Election (LPP). Therefore, collaboration and synergy between election organizers and stakeholders are needed based on collaborative governance to prevent electoral malpractice. The collaborative governance approach encourages collaborative problem solving involving stakeholders based on mutual trust and commitment and is oriented towards consensus. The cycle of collaborative governance that must be passed is face-to-face dialogue, trust-building, commitment to the process, shared understanding, and intermediate outcomes. Furthermore, legal norms are needed to regulate inter-institutional cooperation for election organizers to strengthen collaborative governance.
Highlights
This paper offers collaborative governance as a concept of strengthening collaboration between institutions in the implementation of elections and local elections, namely by examining the phenomenon of electoral malpractice cases in the nomination stages in the 2019 NTT Provincial DPRD Election and the 2020 Sabu Raijua Regent and Deputy Regent Election
The study results based on the case studies in this paper found that the concept of collaborative governance was able to overcome the weakness of the rules and the limitations of the authority of the election organizers at the election and regional head elections
Tantangan ego sektoral masih menjadi momok menakutkan bagi kolaborasi antar lembaga saat ajang elektoral, sehingga collaborative governance harus segera diakomodir dalam Undang-Undang pemilihan umum (Pemilu) dan pemilihan kepala daerah (Pilkada) kemudian pada Peraturan Pemerintah secara khusus mengatur kerjasama antar lembaga Lembaga Penyelenggara Pemilu (LPP)
Summary
Perhelatan pemilihan umum (Pemilu) dan pemilihan kepala daerah (Pilkada) menjadi domain Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU), Badan Pengawas Pemilu (Bawaslu), dan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara. Riwu Kore dan Tobias Uli karena Orient terbukti sebagai warga negara AS dan memerintahkan KPU Sabu Raijua untuk menggelar pemungutan suara ulang dengan dua pasangan calon dalam waktu 60 hari sejak putusan dibacakan. Pada kasus Caleg DPRD NTT diketahui adanya laporan dari instansi tempat yang bersangkutan bekerja sebagai PNS aktif ketika tahapan pemilu masih berlangsung namun KPU telah menetapkan Daftar Calon Tetap (DCT). Pada kasus pertama memang menunjukkan keaktifan dari instansi terkait yakni adanya konfirmasi dari BKKBN kepada KPU NTT namun tidak didahului kolaborasi yang telah disetujui dan disepakati bersama, lalu penanganannya yang akhirnya ditemukan tindakan manipulasi dokumen persyaratan. Dua kasus ini dipilih sebagai contoh persoalan malpraktik elektoral dalam tahapan verifikasi syarat calon yang pola penanganannya melibatkan sejumlah lembaga diluar penyelenggara pemilu sehingga pendekatan collaborative governance sangat dibutuhkan. Sudut pandang yang diambil penulis sebelumnya melihat kesesuaian teori/konsep dengan topik permasalahan sehingga memudahkan interpretasi data secara deskriptif
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
