Abstract
A comparison was made between urethral pressure profiles obtained using a single sensor and 'subtracted' urethral pressure profiles resulting from double sensor recordings in 50 bitches. There were small but significant differences in the functional profile lengths and maximum urethral closure pressures between the two types of recording. The differences were partially explained by a significant fall in the intravesical pressure recorded during profilometry and variations due to respiration. The profiles from single and double sensor recording were of equal significance in the diagnosis of sphincter mechanism incompetence.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
