Abstract
The routine use of ureteric stents after a kidney transplant for prophylactic measures is debatable. Concerns have been raised regarding the potential complications and costs of routine stenting. Here, we review the literature based on studies in favor of and against the routine placement of ureteric stents in kidney transplant patients. Some studies have shown a benefit to patients who have routine stents placed, while others have not shown this benefit but have highlighted the associated financial implications. The decision to stent renal transplant patients will depend on robust multicenter, randomized controlled trials being carried out, as well as both short-term and long-term cost analyses.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
