Abstract

Academic performance (AP) is explained by a multitude of factors, principally by those related to socioeconomic, cultural, and educational environments. However, AP is less understood from a spatial perspective. The aim of this study was to investigate a methodology using a machine learning approach to determine which answers from a questionnaire-based survey were relevant for explaining the high AP of secondary school students across urban–rural gradients in Ecuador. We used high school locations to construct individual datasets and stratify them according to the AP scores. Using the Boruta algorithm and backward elimination, we identified the best predictors, classified them using random forest, and mapped the AP classification probabilities. We summarized these results as frequent answers observed for each natural region in Ecuador and used their probability outputs to formulate hypotheses with respect to the urban–rural gradient derived from annual maps of impervious surfaces. Our approach resulted in a cartographic analysis of AP probabilities with overall accuracies around 0.83–0.84% and Kappa values of 0.65–0.67%. High AP was primarily related to answers regarding the academic environment and cognitive skills. These identified answers varied depending on the region, which allowed for different interpretations of the driving factors of AP in Ecuador. A rural-to-urban transition ranging 8–17 years was found to be the timespan correlated with achievement of high AP.

Highlights

  • Ensuring inclusive and equitable education is one of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) for promoting higher standards of living through economic, social, and environmental progress [1]

  • The Kappa index indicated a substantial agreement with a similar ranking, with the Socioeconomic and cultural (SC) group having a value of 0.67 ± 0.158 and the Cognitive skills (CS) and Academic environment (AE) groups achieving similar values (i.e., 0.65 ± 0.145 and 0.65 ± 0.140, respectively)

  • This means that some models failed to predict the academic performance (AP) classification, and we count that 46.4%, 47.2%, and 49.4% of the high school cases they did not match the expected results for the SC, CS, and AE groups, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ensuring inclusive and equitable education is one of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) for promoting higher standards of living through economic, social, and environmental progress [1]. The achievement of primary or secondary school diplomas provides a benchmark for personal development and promotes high future job performance [2] In this context, evaluating academic performance (AP) is a method of scoring the skills and knowledge accumulated by students throughout their years of study [3]. As AP contributes to the evaluation of students’ performance prior to obtaining jobs or engaging in higher studies, it is associated with unequal territorial development and systematic division This is because access to quality education is often unequal in developing countries [4,5,6]. This is because capital accumulation at educational centers [9] or in households [10] is more evident when its spatial context is observed

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call