Abstract
With accelerating rates of urbanization worldwide, a better understanding of ecological processes at the wildland-urban interface is critical to conserve biodiversity. We explored the effects of high and low-density housing developments on forest-dwelling mammals. Based on habitat characteristics, we expected a gradual decline in species abundance across forest-urban edges and an increased decline rate in higher contrast edges. We surveyed arboreal mammals in sites of high and low housing density along 600 m transects that spanned urban areas and areas turn on adjacent native forest. We also surveyed forest controls to test whether edge effects extended beyond our edge transects. We fitted models describing richness, total abundance and individual species abundance. Low-density housing developments provided suitable habitat for most arboreal mammals. In contrast, high-density housing developments had lower species richness, total abundance and individual species abundance, but supported the highest abundances of an urban adapter (Trichosurus vulpecula). We did not find the predicted gradual decline in species abundance. Of four species analysed, three exhibited no response to the proximity of urban boundaries, but spilled over into adjacent urban habitat to differing extents. One species (Petaurus australis) had an extended negative response to urban boundaries, suggesting that urban development has impacts beyond 300 m into adjacent forest. Our empirical work demonstrates that high-density housing developments have negative effects on both community and species level responses, except for one urban adapter. We developed a new predictive model of edge effects based on our results and the literature. To predict animal responses across edges, our framework integrates for first time: (1) habitat quality/preference, (2) species response with the proximity to the adjacent habitat, and (3) spillover extent/sensitivity to adjacent habitat boundaries. This framework will allow scientists, managers and planners better understand and predict both species responses across edges and impacts of development in mosaic landscapes.
Highlights
Urbanization is a strong driver of environmental modification worldwide [1,2]
Total Abundance The total abundance of arboreal marsupials differed with distance to the urban boundary when we compared urban cover with different housing densities (Figure 3A)
In urban cover with high housing density, the abundance of arboreal marsupials declined with distance to the urban boundary; whereas in urban cover with low housing density, the abundance of arboreal marsupials increased with distance to the urban boundary (Wald contrast test, P = 0.03) (Figure 3A)
Summary
Urbanization is a strong driver of environmental modification worldwide [1,2]. Currently, there are more than seven billion people on earth, with more than half living in urban areas [3]. The pressure for urban development will lead to continued urban expansion. These changing environmental conditions will cause loss, degradation, fragmentation and isolation of remnant habitats [5]; and affect biodiversity at local, landscape and regional scales [6,7]. As a result of urbanization, animals are increasingly exposed to urban boundaries with different edge contrasts [8,9]. Edge contrast, defined as the difference in composition or structure between adjoining ecosystems at both sides of the boundary [10], is a key element influencing the movement of animals across landscapes [11]. It is expected that a boundary with high contrast between juxtaposed patches (i.e. a ‘‘hard edge’’) will generate a more pronounced reduction in the movement of animals than a ‘‘softer edge’’ [8,14,15,16], leading to a differential length, depth or penetration of edge effects [10]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.