Abstract

Urbanisation is a globally occurring phenomenon and is predicted to continue increasing rapidly. Urban ecosystems present novel environments and challenges which species must acclimate or adapt to. These novel challenges alter existing or create new selection pressures on behaviours which provide an opportunity to investigate eco-evolutionary responses to contemporary environmental change. We used 7 years of breeding data from urban and forest populations of blue and great tits to understand whether selection for timing of breeding or clutch size differed between the two habitats and species. We found that urban great tits laid eggs earlier than their forest counterparts, but there was no evidence of a difference in selection for earlier breeding. Blue tits, however, did not differ in timing of egg laying between the two habitats, but selection for earlier laying was weaker in the urban environment. Both species laid smaller clutches in the urban site and had positive selection for larger clutch sizes which did not differ in strength for the great tits but did for blue tits, with weaker selection in the urban population. Our results suggest that food availability for nestlings may be constraining urban birds, and that the temporal cues females use to time breeding correctly, such as tree budburst and food availability, may be absent or reduced in urban areas due to lower caterpillar availability. These results have implications for our understanding of the adaptation of wild animals to city life.Significance statementUrbanisation is expanding rapidly and changing the environment many species live in. A key challenge is to understand how species adapt to the urban environment, why some species can adapt, why others cannot and what we can do to ensure that cities are ecologically sustainable and biodiversity rich. Here we show that the strength of natural selection for early breeding and larger clutch size is weaker in urban than non-urban blue tits, likely due to reduced and irregular availability of natural insect food in urban areas. This effect was not found in great tits. Thus, urbanisation can alter the selection pressures wild animals are exposed to, but this effect may differ between species, even when closely related. This has implications for our understanding of how species adapt to urban life.

Highlights

  • Urbanisation is a globally increasing phenomenon that shows no signs of halting

  • There was no difference in variance in first egg date (FED) between urban and forest blue tits, but there was higher variance in clutch size of forest blue tits (FED: σ2urban = 46.8, σ2forest = 53.3, Fisher’s F test: F214,386 = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.70–1.12, p = 0.29; clutch size: σ2urban = 3.36, σ2forest = 5.58, Fisher’s F test: F214,381 = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.48–0.77, p =

  • The variance in FED was higher in the urban than forest great tits, but variance in clutch size did not differ between the two habitats (FED: σ2urban = 77.2, σ2forest = 32.8, Fisher’s F test: F52,96 = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.48–3.88, p =

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urbanisation is a globally increasing phenomenon that shows no signs of halting. Urban areas covered 652,825 ­km of terrestrial land globally in 2000, and it is predicted that by 2030 global urban land cover will have tripled in extent (Seto et al 2012). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (2021) 75:155 have been studied for over a century, revealing extensive phenotypic divergence between urban and rural conspecifics (Donihue and Lambert 2015; Marzluff 2016; Alberti et al 2017) It is still unclear whether such phenotypic differences between urban and rural populations represent adaptive responses to urban environments and the evolutionary mechanisms that generate them (Donihue and Lambert 2015; Johnson and Munshi-South 2017; Szulkin et al 2020; Lambert et al 2021). There is a need to fully assess the ecological and evolutionary processes leading to phenotypic changes in urban populations (Johnson and Munshi-South 2017; Rivkin et al 2019; Lambert et al 2021) To this end, it is imperative to identify how variation in traits corresponds to fitness, and whether these associations differ between urban and rural populations (Ouyang et al 2018; Szulkin et al 2020)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call