Abstract

The continuing loss of urban wetlands due to an expanding human population and urban development pressures makes restoration or creation of urban wetlands a high priority. However, urban wetland restorations are particularly challenging due to altered hydrologic patterns, a high proportion of impervious surface and stormwater runoff, degraded urban soils, historic contamination, and competitive pressure from non-native species. Urban wetland projects must also consider human-desired socio-economic benefits. We argue that using current wetland restoration approaches and existing regulatory “success” criteria, such as meeting restoration targets for vegetation structure based on reference sites in non-urban locations, will result in “failed” urban restorations. Using three wetland Case Studies in highly urbanized locations, we describe geophysical tools, stormwater management methods, and design approaches useful in addressing urban challenges and in supporting “successful” urban rehabilitation outcomes. We suggest that in human-dominated landscapes, the current paradigm of “restoration” to a previous state must shift to a paradigm of “rehabilitation”, which prioritizes wetland functions and values rather than vegetation structure in order to provide increased ecological benefits and much needed urban open space amenities.

Highlights

  • Rapid urbanization is producing enormous ecological change [1]

  • Urban wetland restorations are challenging due to altered hydrologic patterns, a high proportion of impervious surface and stormwater runoff, degraded urban soils, historic contamination, and competitive pressure from non-native species

  • We argue that using current wetland restoration approaches and existing regulatory ―success‖ criteria, such as meeting restoration targets for vegetation structure based on reference sites in non-urban locations, will result in ―failed‖ urban restorations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rapid urbanization is producing enormous ecological change [1]. Fifty-four percent of the human population lives under urban conditions, and this proportion is projected to reach 60% of an expanding population within the 13 years [2,3]. Well documented beneficial functions provided by wetland ecosystems [14] are of great ecological value in urban settings close to where people live [7,15,16,17,18]. Guidelines developed by USEPA to support successful wetland restoration outcomes include: restoration of ecological integrity, natural structure, and function(s); restoration designs that fit within an entire watershed; use of a reference site; establishment of clear, achievable, and measureable restoration goals; and anticipation of future changes [28]. If urban wetland rehabilitation is to be successful, current regulatory paradigms concerning the use of undisturbed reference sites and predictable ecological trajectories must change [32]. Opportunities to compensate for wetland loss (mitigation) in heavily urbanized areas are extremely limited, and so regulatory flexibility must support and encourage restoration projects that enhance ecological values and functions

Urban wetland restoration challenges
Restoration within a landscape and watershed context
Urban versus reference site hydrology and vegetation
Rehabilitation within an urban socio-economic context
Case studies
Findings
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call