Abstract

Seasonal changes in temperature and day length are distinct between rural and urban areas due to urban warming and the presence of artificial light at night. Many studies have focused on the impacts of these ubiquitous signatures on daily biological events, but empirical studies on their impacts on insect seasonality are limited. In the present study, we used the flesh fly Sarcophaga similis as a model insect to determine the impacts of urbanization on the incidence and timing of diapause (dormancy), not only in the laboratory but also in rural and urban conditions. In the laboratory, diapause entry was affected by night-time light levels as low as 0.01 lux. We placed fly cages on outdoor shelves in urban and rural areas to determine the timing of diapause entry; it was retarded by approximately four weeks in urban areas relative to that in rural areas. Moreover, almost all flies in the site facing an urban residential area failed to enter diapause, even by late autumn. Although an autumnal low temperature in the urban area would mitigate the negative effect of artificial light at night, strong light pollution seriously disrupts the flesh fly seasonal adaptation.

Highlights

  • The conversion of natural and semi-natural habitats to urban areas increased drastically worldwide due to rapid demographic and economic growth [1,2]

  • We focused on the effect of urban warming and artificial light at night on diapause entry in a flesh fly

  • The response was disrupted by artificial light at night; even 0.01 lux light illumination affected diapause entry at 20°C

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The conversion of natural and semi-natural habitats to urban areas increased drastically worldwide due to rapid demographic and economic growth [1,2]. The ecological effects of urbanization are initially realized through substantial changes in the physical environment, including the atmosphere, water bodies, temperature and land surface, resulting in a marked urban–rural difference [3,4]. These changes affect urban ecosystems and their components at the individual, population and community levels [5,6]. The effect of urbanization on individuals is, necessarily mediated through behavioural and physiological responses [11,12].

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.