Abstract

The discovery of oil and gas in Uganda has attracted many investors, leading to increase in fuel/gas distributing companies and fueling stations creating rapid demand for land to locate the stations compared to available open urban land. Because of the explosive and combustion characteristics of fuel stored and dispensed at stations, several studies have been conducted on different fires at fueling stations such as static fire, jet fire, vapor cloud explosions, open fires, etc. but there was need to assess spatially the risk of fire from stations, its consequences and sovereignty on buildings surrounding them. This was done basing on seven parameters—proximity of buildings to stations, building materials, distance between buildings, wind speed, temperature, slope and vegetation. Analytical hierarchy process and pairwise comparison were used to weight the parameters based on their relative importance. Weighted sum tool was applied to generate the fire risk maps for the quarters—December to February, March to May, June to August, and September to November from 2008 to 2013. The parameters were overlaid with the buildings in each risk zone for all the four quarters and their influences determined. The highest contributors were proximity of the buildings to stations, building materials and separation between buildings. Most of the affected buildings were made of rusted corrugated iron sheets and wood; the separation distance from one building to another ranged from 0 - 4 m. Most of buildings located within 100 m from stations were at moderate risk level and within 50 m were at highest risk level. The period of December to February and June to August had the highest risk. The findings can be used to guide planners and policy makers on building location vs. material vs. separation. It can also guide developers on where, when and how to carry out their developments.

Highlights

  • East Africa’s oil and gas sector is increasingly becoming the focus of many investors

  • Very high-risk level: This zone consists of buildings located 0 - 2 m from each other, within 0 - 100 m from fuel stations and majority having rusted corrugated iron sheets on wood

  • High risk level: This zone consists of the majority of the buildings with rusted corrugated iron sheets on wood, located 0 - 4 m from each other and within 50 - 250 m from fuel stations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

East Africa’s oil and gas sector is increasingly becoming the focus of many investors. A study on the different fires at fuel stations [6] stated the following as sources of fuel station fires static electricity, open fire, thunder strike, high temperature, impact friction, and electrical sparks. He suggested that, the stations must be equipped with firewater systems, firefighting equipment should be well configured and refueling technology and facilities should be of good quality and well laid in appropriate manner. Apaco minated to workers before they agree to work at fuel stations as a hazardous premise They stated that, there is need for more studies assessing spatially the risk of fire from fuel stations, their consequences and sovereignty on buildings surrounding them. It can guide developers on where, when and how to carry out their developments in areas neighboring fueling stations

Literature Review
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call