Abstract

Experience with urban social protection programmes is relatively limited in the Global South. Extensions or duplicates of rural social assistance programmes do not reflect the distinct vulnerabilities of the urban poor, who face higher living costs and more precarious employment, and are not reached by social insurance schemes that are designed for formally employed workers. Neither the Sustainable Development Goals nor the New Urban Agenda reflect a specific focus on urban social protection. COVID-19 has exposed this major gap in coverage, given the disproportionate impact of lockdowns on the livelihoods of the urban poor. To ‘build back better’ post COVID-19, we propose rights-based national social protection systems with two components: categorical social assistance for non-working vulnerable groups (children, older persons, persons with disability) and universal social insurance for all working adults (formal, informal or self-employed), financed out of general revenues rather than mandatory contributions by employees and employers. These ideas are explored in the case of South Africa, which has comprehensive social assistance but inadequate social insurance for urban informal workers.

Highlights

  • More than half the world’s population lives in urban areas, but most social assistance programmes in the Global South were10.1177/14649934211020858 dependency, humanitarian considerations and technological change (Varshney 1993)

  • Women are less likely to be eligible for social protection, and their specific life cycle needs and risks are less likely to be covered by social insurance (Holmes and Scott, 2016)

  • High levels of informality or unemployment, low and variable incomes, and variable access to and quality of basic services all call for a tailored urban social protection strategy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

More than half the world’s population lives in urban areas, but most social assistance programmes in the Global South were10.1177/14649934211020858 dependency, humanitarian considerations and technological change (Varshney 1993). Designs of urban social protection that fail to account for higher living costs, higher levels of informality and unemployment, low and variable incomes, gendered and life cycle vulnerabilities and variable access to adequate basic services would have limited success, even in a world without COVID-19.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.