Abstract

Access to good public transit for low-socioeconomic communities has been an important concern in transportation planning and urban studies research. In Portland, Oregon, USA, the rapid growth of housing prices and rents in the urban core has caused displacement of low-income residents to peripheral and suburban neighborhoods where housing is more affordable. Because public transit is generally more limited in the urban periphery and suburbs, there is concern that the low-income suburban residents may have more limited access to Portland’s light rail transit service than more affluent residents do. This study examines the relationships between the light rail transit accessibility and socioeconomic status—income, race and ethnicity—in the Portland metro area. Light rail transit accessibility is compared for all income and racial/ethnic groups across four access zones. Multinomial logistic econometric models were used to measure likelihood differences of being located in different access zones between each demographic group. The results show that there is no significant barrier for low-income and racial and ethnic minority residents to access urban rail transit in Portland. The results suggest that despite low-income residents’ movement to the suburbs, Portland’s urban rail transit system continues to serve all residents by providing cohesive connections between the urban core, periphery and suburbs.

Highlights

  • Accessibility is a measure of how people can travel from the origin to the destination [1]

  • This study examines the relationships between the light rail transit accessibility and socioeconomic status—income, race and ethnicity—in the Portland metro area

  • The results show that there is no significant barrier for low-income and racial and ethnic minority residents to access urban rail transit in Portland

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Accessibility is a measure of how people can travel from the origin to the destination [1]. Public transit services are indispensable for low-socioeconomic groups to access jobs, services, and amenities because they often cannot own a personal vehicle. Public transit systems help reduce social and economic disparities. Access to public transit directly affects the accessibility of those who depend on it. We define public transit accessibility of residents as travel distance between residence and the closest transit stops. In the United States, social and economic status has a strong relationship with the race and ethnicity. Central urban neighborhoods have been increasingly upgraded in rapidly growing American cities as they attracted residential and commercial developments, jobs, and investments. Low-income residents have had to relocate to the peripheral and suburban areas to seek affordable housing

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call