Abstract

One of the major challenges for urban planning in Latin America is to provide low-income families with housing in areas that have an infrastructure and a good supply of jobs and services, thereby promoting diversity and equity, translated by mixing classes, races and social cohesion. This mission becomes increasingly difficult in a neoliberal capitalist context which transfers the task of providing land and housing for low-income families to the market and where the logic of such actions is based on achieving more rent from land and consequently of the holding of real estate becoming more profitable. This paper sets out to discuss two proposals for urban instruments that dialog with the production of housing through the market and guarantee of the right to the city. The first centered on the reserve of land for the production of social interest housing (HIS, in Portuguese) in the zoning by creating Special Social Interest Housing Zones (ZEIS, in Portuguese), spread throughout Brazil, and described here based on the experience of São Paulo. Or else, comparatively, classifying land to be used as a priority for social housing (vivienda de interés prioritário) widespread in Colombia, and here presented by the Bogota experience. There is another, which already has international experience and has recently been debated in Brazil, which consists of conceiving of the promotion of social interest housing policies based on the regulation of urban restructuring but experiences of this are rare in Brazil. These may be termed as inclusive housing policies. As a result, this article points out that the creation of alternative regulations has set the tone for the market to exclude itself from producing housing of social interest, and guarantees greater profitability to commercial undertakings.

Highlights

  • One of the major challenges for urban planning in Latin America is to provide low-income families with housing in areas that have an infrastructure and a good supply of jobs and services, thereby promoting diversity and equity, translated by mixing classes, races and social cohesion

  • One of the major challenges for urban planning in Latin America is to provide affordable housing for low-income families in areas with infrastructure, thereby promoting social mix and social cohesion. This mission becomes increasingly difficult in a neoliberal context in which the task of providing land and housing for low-income families is transferred to the market, in which the logic of its activity is based on achieving the greatest profitability on real estate

  • Santoro and Borrelli (2015) indicated that discussions on the master plan of São Paulo could be divided into two broader groups: on the one hand, there were the elites concerned about safeguarding their victories, and, on the other hand, there were residents of outlying areas, demanding improvements in sanitation, infrastructure and, primarily, clamouring for the setting of new ZEIS perimeters

Read more

Summary

Some of the theory on inclusionary housing policies

One of the major challenges for urban planning in Latin America is to provide affordable housing for low-income families in areas with infrastructure, thereby promoting social mix and social cohesion. This mission becomes increasingly difficult in a neoliberal context in which the task of providing land and housing for low-income families is transferred to the market, in which the logic of its activity is based on achieving the greatest profitability on real estate

Urban planning instruments for promoting social interest housing
PAULA FREIRE SANTORO
The case of ZEIS in São Paulo
Inclusionary housing policies derived from urban restructuring regulation
Social interest housing in the Joint Urban Operations in São Paulo
Compulsory percentages of land and units for social housing in Colombia
Macro projects
Findings
Final considerations

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.